Third Note to “Defining Strategic Rationality”

Discourse is what makes or breaks a state, and as we said before, the deep state will not relent until we relinquish an open and independent discourse for “Cold War Intellectualism” or “NATO Intellectualism.” Which is fine. I understand where they are coming from. It’s about where your loyalties are after all. Are your loyalties to Washington or to Moscow? But I will pose a question to the deep state in response to the question of whether one’s loyalties are to Washington or to Moscow, which is that is it rational and sane – let alone patriotic and pro-American – to piss away 75 percent of your air defense supply in twelve days because a foreign lobbying and special interest group corrupted and perverted the entirety of the state system to the point where basic change and reform and common sense and logic is inconceivable and totally out of reach? I would contend that is irrational, insane, unpatriotic, and treasonous to piss away 75 percent of your air defense supply because of a bribe from a foreigner. Do you agree or disagree, deep state?